In our society men have power. With few
exceptions, men control the media, the financial sector, politics, religion and
theivory tower. Their power is pervasive. It is not only exercised through
corporate means, individual men exercise power in their relationships
emotionally, financially, and physically. Even more disturbing is that the
scope of these corporate and individual powers extends to reproductive
healthcare. The issues surrounding gender inequality in this realm of medicine
are intimately entwined with the power of men. Take for example medications
designed to treat erectile dysfunction. Medications such as Viagra are
advertised on prime time television. At any given time, television
networksconsist of about 2600 channels and generate annual revenue of
out 57 billion dollars. While the actual television show being broadcast only
contributes about 60 percent of networks’ revenue, advertising contributes about
45 percent. With advertising contributing such a large percentage of networks’
revenue, maybe taking a look at what is advertised is important. These ads are
targeted at men, usually portrayed as “average Joes” who are being chased by
lusty women and present the inability of a man to get or maintain an erection as
a disease. According to the Viagra
websiteif a man even experiences occasional disruption to his sexual
satisfaction, he should talk to his doctor. A woman’s decreased libido,
however, is not recognized as a problem, let alone a disease. Since her
pregnancy, my sister has been struggling with the issue of decreased libido. She
has even made an effort to discuss her concerns with her doctor. After blood
work showed no signs of hormonal imbalance, her doctor said there was not much
she could do to help. She was even told—by a female doctor—that if she was
having sex once a week she was “doing good” and still had unrealistic pre-motherhood
expectations of sexual satisfaction and frequency. She told her doctor that it
may be ‘unrealistic,’ but her husband’s frequency of desire and her lack
thereof was causing significant turmoil in their relationship. She merely
wanted to be treated like she had a legitimate medical concern. Her doctor went
on to explain that while it may seem archaic, “sometimes you just need to find
it in you somewhere because men tend to stray when their needs aren’t being
met.” In the case of prescription medications, the research for these drugs has
been funded prior to their approval by the FDA. This disparity in treatment is
being fueled by the fact that overwhelmingly men are funding and conducting the
research. Moreover, the idea that this disease needs to be treated for men by prescribing
drugs perpetuates the notion and the cultural expectation that men need to “sow
their seed.” Only in this context, not treating women who suffer decreased
libido while naming a disease and funding research for men who suffer the same
malady, would men assert that this inconsistency make sense.
What the doctor said to your sister is completely offensive. I always say, if men could menstruate tampons would be federally funded. Sexuality and reproductive services seem to be a male only domain. If a man's libido is too strong, he's a stud. If a woman's libido is too strong, she's a slut. If a man's libido is low, it's a medical problem. If a woman's is low, she needs to tough it out and hope her husband doesn't cheat. I hate to beat a dead horse, but it's a really old, annoying, persistent double standard. There is a similar problem with contraception, too. Specifically the fact that in some states it is legal to deny emergency contraception to paying customers due to 'religious beliefs.' If men were the ones using birth control, I guarantee it would be given out like candy.
Doesn't it boil down to the same old thing, that women are here just to make men happy. My mother told me the day before I got married that I wouldn't enjoy sex, but that it was my wifely duty. A month later she asked me how I was doing in the "sex department". When I told her I like sex she looked at me disgusted. Sex should be enjoyed by both men and women, and a women's needs are important too. Research should be done to improve our sex drive and "performance" also.
What the doctor said to your sister is completely offensive. I always say, if men could menstruate tampons would be federally funded. Sexuality and reproductive services seem to be a male only domain. If a man's libido is too strong, he's a stud. If a woman's libido is too strong, she's a slut. If a man's libido is low, it's a medical problem. If a woman's is low, she needs to tough it out and hope her husband doesn't cheat. I hate to beat a dead horse, but it's a really old, annoying, persistent double standard. There is a similar problem with contraception, too. Specifically the fact that in some states it is legal to deny emergency contraception to paying customers due to 'religious beliefs.' If men were the ones using birth control, I guarantee it would be given out like candy.
ReplyDeleteCondoms are given out like candy. High Schools and Colleges give them away for free.
ReplyDeleteDoesn't it boil down to the same old thing, that women are here just to make men happy. My mother told me the day before I got married that I wouldn't enjoy sex, but that it was my wifely duty. A month later she asked me how I was doing in the "sex department". When I told her I like sex she looked at me disgusted.
ReplyDeleteSex should be enjoyed by both men and women, and a women's needs are important too. Research should be done to improve our sex drive and "performance" also.